NCAA Tournament 2026 Betting Percentages: Trends, Line Movement, & Sharp Money

NCAA Tournament 2026 Betting Percentages: Trends, Line Movement, & Sharp Money

As NCAAB public betting money pours in at sportsbooks for March Madness, the markets are reacting leading up to tip-off on Thursday. This is one of the largest sports wagering events of the year, and millions of dollars is being staked at sportsbooks with clear trends beginning to emerge.

We are putting the latest NCAA Tournament betting trends into context, including answering where is public money going on March Madness and the sharp wagers? Also, we dive into how to leverage these trends and how to use betting trends for March Madness to your advantage.

March Madness Betting Percentages (First Round)

MATCHUPATS % of Money (Handle)ATS % of BetsO/U % of Money (Handle)O/U % of Bets
Ohio State
vs.
TCU
Ohio St. -2.5 (43%)
TCU +2.5 (57%)
Ohio St. -2.5 (57%)
TCU +2.5 (43%) 
Over 146 (41%)
Under 146 (59%)
Over 146 (55%)
Under 146 (45%)
Nebraska
vs.
Troy
Nebraska -13 (82%)
Troy +13 (18%)  
Nebraska -13 (62%)
Troy +13 (38%)  
Over 138 (58%)
Under 138 (42%)
Over 138 (67%)
Under 138 (33%)
Louisville
vs.
South Florida
Louisville -5.5 (19%)
South Florida +5.5 (81%)
Louisville -5.5 (30%)
South Florida +5.5 (70%)
Over 165 (73%)
Under 165 (27%)
Over 165 (48%)
Under 165 (52%)
Wisconsin
vs.
High Point
Wisconsin -10 (35%)
High Point +10 (65%)
Wisconsin -10 (49%)
High Point +10 (51%)
Over 164.5 (80%)
Over 164.5 (20%)
Over 164.5 (58%)
Under 164.5 (42%)
Duke
vs.
Siena
Duke -27.5 (63%)
Siena +27.5 (37%)
Duke -27.5 (85%)
Siena +27.5 (15%)
Over 135.5 (52%)
Under 135.5 (48%)
Over 135.5 (73%)
Under 135.5 (27%)
Vanderbilt
vs.
McNeese St.
Vanderbilt -11.5 (59%)
McNeese St. +11.5 (41%)
Vanderbilt -11.5 (48%)
McNeese St. +11.5 (52%)
Over 150.5 (65%)
Under 150.5 (35%)
Over 150.5 (56%)
Under 150.5 (44%)
Michigan St.
vs.
North Dakota St. 
Michigan St. -16.5 (60%)
North Dakota St. +16.5 (40%)
Michigan St. -16.5 (70%)
North Dakota St. +16.5 (30%)
Over 143.5 (50%)
Over 143.5 (50%)
Over 143.5 (60%)
Under 143.5 (40%)
Arkansas
vs.
Hawaii
Arkansas -15.5 (41%)
Hawaii +15.5 (59%)
Arkansas -15.5 (62%)
Hawaii +15.5 (38%)
Over 160 (28%)
Under 160 (72%)
Over 160 (40%)
Under 160 (60%)
North Carolina
vs.
VCU
North Carolina -2.5 (45%)
VCU +2.5 (55%)
North Carolina -2.5 (50%)
VCU +2.5 (50%)
Over 153.5 (14%)
Under 153.5 (86%)
Over 153.5 (40%)
Under 153.5 (60%)
Saint Mary’s
vs.
Texas A&M
Saint Mary’s -3.5 (64%)
Texas A&M +3.5 (36%)
Saint Mary’s -3.5 (49%)
Texas A&M +3.5 (51%)
Over 147.5 (43%)
Under 147.5 (57%)
Over 147.5 (51%)
Under 147.5 (49%)
Illinois
vs.
Pennsylvania
Illinois -24.5 (37%)
Pennsylvania +24.5 (63%)
Illinois -24.5 (48%)
Pennsylvania +24.5 (52%)
Over 151 (80%)
Under 151 (20%)
Over 151 (59%)
Under 151 (41%)
Georgia
vs.
Saint Louis
Georgia -2.5 (65%)
Saint Louis +2.5 (35%)
Georgia -2.5 (49%)
Saint Louis +2.5 (51%)
Over 169 (40%)
Under 169 (60%)
Over 169 (37%)
Under 169 (63%)
Gonzaga
vs.
Kennesaw St.
Gonzaga -20.5 (71%)
Kennesaw St. +20.5 (29%)
Gonzaga -20.5 (60%)
Kennesaw St. +20.5 (40%)
Over 154 (30%)
Under 154 (70%)
Over 154 (34%)
Under 154 (64%)
Kentucky
vs.
Santa Clara
Kentucky -3.5 (40%)
Santa Clara +3.5 (60%)
Kentucky -3.5 (48%)
Santa Clara +3.5 (52%)
Over 160.5 (25%)
Under 160.5 (75%)
Over 160.5 (35%)
Under 160.5 (65%)
Texas Tech
vs.
Akron
Texas Tech -8.5 (20%)
Akron +8.5 (80%)
Texas Tech -8.5 (33%)
Akron (67%)
Over 156 (45%)
Under 156 (55%)
Over 156 (52%)
Under 156 (48%)
Arizona
vs.
Long Island
Arizona -30.5 (70%)
Long Island +30.5 (30%)
Arizona -30.5 (86%)
Long Island +30.5 (14%)
Over 151.5 (20%)
Under 151.5 (80%)
Over 151.5 (45%)
Under 151.5 (55%)
Virginia
vs.
Wright St.
Virginia -18.5 (51%)
Wright St. +18.5 (49%)
Virginia -18.5 (56%)
Wright St. +18.5 (44%)
Over 146 (29%)
Under 146 (71%)
Over 146 (48%)
Under 146 (52%)
Iowa St.
vs
Tennessee St.
Iowa St. -24.5 (68%)
Tennessee St. +24.5 (32%)
Iowa St. -24.5 (85%)
Tennessee St. (15%)
Over 148.5 (40%)
Under 148.5 (60%)
Over 148.5 (45%)
Under 148.5 (55%)
Alabama
vs.
Hofstra
Alabama -11.5 (36%)
Hofstra +11.5 (64%)
Alabama -11.5 (55%)
Hofstra +11.5 (45%)
Over 158.5 (32%)
Under 158.5 (68%)
Over 158.5 (48%)
Under 158.5 (52%)
Utah St.
vs.
Villanova
Utah St. -1.5 (55%)
Villanova +1.5 (45%)
Utah St. -1.5 (53%)
Villanova (47%)
Over 147 (40%)
Under 147 (60%)
Over 147 (51%)
Under 147 (49%)
Iowa
vs.
Clemson
Iowa -2.5 (72%)
Clemson +2.5 (28%)
Iowa -2.5 (50%)
Clemson +2.5 (50%)
Over 129 (35%)
Under 129 (65%)
Over 129 (48%)
Under 129 (52%)
St. John’s
vs.
Northern Iowa
St. John’s -10.5 (51%)
Northern Iowa +10.5 (49%)
St. John’s -10.5 (62%)
Northern Iowa +10.5 (38%)
Over 131.5 (55%)
Under 131.5 (45%)
Over 131.5 (59%)
Under 131.5 (41%)
UCLA
vs.
Central Florida
UCLA -6 (53%) Central Florida +6 (47%)UCLA -6 (41%)
Central Florida (59%)
Over 152.5 (24%)
Under 152.5 (76%)
Over 152.5 (40%)
Under 152.5 (60%)
Purdue
vs.
Queens NC
Purdue -25.5 (68%)
Queens NC +25.5 (32%)
Purdue -25.5 (85%)
Queens NC +25.5 (15%)
Over 163.5 (38%)
Under 163.5 (62%)
Over 163.5 (30%)
Under 163.5 (70%)
Kansas
vs.
California Baptist
Kansas -14.5 (75%)
California Baptist +14.5 (25%)
Kansas -14.5 (70%)
California Baptist +14.5 (30%)
Over 138.5 (45%)
Under 138.5 (55%)
Over 138.5 (60%)
Under 138.5 (40%)
UConn
vs.
Furman
UConn -20.5 (62%)
Furman +20.5 (38%)
UConn -20.5 (76%)
Furman +20.5 (24%)
Over 136.5 (30%)
Under 136.5 (70%)
Over 136.5 (67%)
Under 136.5 (33%)
Miami
vs.
Missouri
Miami -1.5 (59%)
Missouri +1.5 (41%)
Miami -1.5 (60%)
Missouri +1.5 (40%)
Over 147.5 (22%)
Under 147.5 (78%)
Over 147.5 (55%)
Under 147.5 (45%)

Above, you can find the data for public betting on March Madness as of Wednesday, March 18. We have compiled information for the percentage of total public bets and total money wagered, otherwise known as the betting handle, from top March Madness betting sites.

The percentage of bets column reflects how many individual wagers are placed on each side, without accounting for the size of those bets. In contrast, the betting handle measures the total amount of money wagered on each outcome.

Because one big bet can outweigh many small ones, these two percentages often differ. Looking at both helps identify where the sharp money is for the NCAA Tournament and spot meaningful trends.

Here are some key March Madness public betting trends:

  • The Arizona Wildcats (-30.5), the largest favorite in the First Round, have the highest percentage of bets at 86%. The Iowa State Cyclones (-24.5) Purdue Boilermakers (-25.5), and Duke Blue Devils (-27.5) are close behind at 85%
  • The Nebraska Cornhuskers (-13) lead in percentage of total money wagered, with 82% of the handle.
  • The South Florida Bulls (+5.5) stand out among underdogs, drawing both the highest percentage of bets (70%) and the highest percentage of total money wagered (81%) for dogs.
  • On totals, the Over 135.5 in Siena vs. Duke has the highest percentage of bets at 73%.
  • The Under 153.5 in VCU vs. North Carolina has the highest percentage of total money wagered on a total, at 86% of the handle.
  • The largest gap between handle and ticket count is on Hawaii (+15.5), with 59% of the money but only 38% of the bets, suggesting fewer but larger wagers on the Rainbow Warriors.

**Note that these odds and percentages are subject to change by tip-off.

NCAAB Line Movement for March Madness

Beyond tracking March Madness betting percentages, reading line movement is a crucial tool for informed bettors. Oddsmakers released First Round lines shortly after the Selection Sunday bracket reveal, and those numbers have shifted as wagers have come in.

Small adjustments usually signal that there hasn’t been enough money on either side to move the line much. Meanwhile, notable shifts often reflect large wagers that force oddsmakers to react. Sharp bettors look to attack soft opening numbers, and their early action is frequently what drives those bigger moves.

Here, I’ve outlined the most notable NCAA Tournament line movement (March 15 to 18) on the board at Lucky Rebel:

    • Wisconsin Badgers -12.5 to -10 vs. High Point
    • Gonzaga Bulldogs -18.5 to -20.5 vs. Kennesaw State
    • Illinois Fighting Illini -22.5 to -24.5 vs. Pennsylvania
    • UConn -18.5 to -20.5 vs. Furman
    • Purdue -23.5 to -25.5 vs. Queens NC

The Wisconsin Badgers opened as 12.5-point favorites, but public money drove that number down to as low as 9.5. They’re now sitting as 10-point favorites, with 65% of the betting handle on High Point. We’re seeing a similar pattern with the Gonzaga Bulldogs, UConn Huskies, and Purdue Boilermakers.

Gonzaga’s spread has moved two points in their favor, with 71% of the money backing them to cover. UConn’s line has also jumped by two points, as 62% of the handle and 72% of tickets are on the Huskies.

In both cases, the market is behaving as you’d expect: when one side attracts most of the money, sportsbooks adjust the line to balance their risk. The same applies to the Purdue Boilermakers against Queens NC, who have 85% of tickets and 68% of money backing them to cover.

The interesting outlier is the Illinois Fighting Illini. Despite 62% of the betting handle and 52% of wagers coming in on Pennsylvania, Illinois’ point spread has actually increased.

white-lightbulb

So, what’s going on here?

This could be a case of a small group of sharp bettors catching the attention of the sportsbooks. A handful of well-respected, higher-stakes players backing Illinois can outweigh a larger number of smaller public bets on Pennsylvania.

It’s also possible that the online books’ opening number was simply off. As their models updated and more information came in, they may have adjusted the spread in Illinois’ favor, regardless of where most of the money was going.

Most of the time, odds move in the same direction as the money, but as the Illinois example shows, not always.

The market could effectively be saying: despite the majority showing on Penn, the most trusted or largest money thinks Illinois should be priced higher, and our model agrees or is catching up.

Sharp vs. Square Betting March Madness

Sharp money on the NCAA Tournament refers to where the most knowledgeable and successful bettors are placing their wagers, often including professionals.

On the other hand, square bettors are typically recreational. They tend to rely on gut feelings or simply choose the team they perceive as “better,” without doing meaningful research or analysis.

There isn’t a single, definitive signal that shows exactly where the sharp money is going, but there are several useful indicators. Reading NCAA Tournament line movement is key, as in the Illinois example above, as well as tracking how public money is distributed.

One trend to watch is when the betting handle (the total amount of money wagered) is significantly higher than the percentage of bets placed on that side.

When this happens, it can suggest that larger, potentially sharper bettors are backing that team. I’ve highlighted the games that fit this criterion below:

Game Spread Bet Handle % Bets %
Hawaii vs. Arkansas Hawaii +15.5 59% 38%
Hofstra vs. Alabama Hofstra +11.5 64% 45%
TCU vs. Ohio State TCU +2.5 57% 43%
Georgia vs. Saint Louis Georgia -2.5 65% 49%
Saint Mary’s vs. Texas A&M Saint Mary’s -3.5 64% 49%
Iowa vs. Clemson Iowa -2.5 72% 50%

While this isn’t a cheat code for making free money, it does show where the big bets are going in the public square. The vast majority of wagers come from small, recreational bettors, so they dominate the total percentage of bets.

When the handle is significantly higher than the percentage of bets, it’s generally understood that large, sharp wagers are likely causing the gap.

Now that you have a head start on early NCAAB line movement for the NCAA Tournament and how to use betting trends for March Madness, we’ve found the perfect online betting site to execute your plan.

With a focus on the NCAA Tournament, Lucky Rebel is offering bettors a chance to cash in on multiple markets. For a limited time, deposit at Lucky Rebel to claim a 125% match bonus of up to $1,250.

Welcome Bonus 125% up to $1,250
  • Fast crypto withdrawals
  • High bet limits
  • New betting markets on request
Sub Categories:
About the Author
Kyle Eve profile picture
Kyle Eve
Editor-in-Chief
facebooktwitter
Kyle Eve is Editor-in-Chief of The Sports Geek, providing reliable analysis for millions of readers since joining the team in 2012. After placing his first sports bet on his 18th birthday, Kyle has devoted his entire adult life to becoming the best bettor he can be. He’s covered some of the biggest sporting events in the world, from the Super Bowl and World Series to the NBA Finals and Kentucky Derby. Kyle lives in Windsor, Ontario.
Comments
Leave A Comment

You must be logged in to comment. Don't have an account? Sign up today.